We accept a limited number of cases per year. Each one is worked up by a senior trial lawyer, filed in court, fully developed in discovery, and prepared for a jury. Carriers and defense counsel evaluating exposure should treat any case we have signed as a case that will be tried.
Small docket, trial-first posture, and court-tested leadership define the firm’s litigation credibility.
We accept a limited number of cases each year. Our partners do not delegate depositions to junior associates or settle files at the outset to clear inventory. A reduced caseload is how we deliver trial-grade preparation on every matter.
Our attorneys have tried cases to verdict in Texas state court, including a $166 million jury verdict in a complex civil case, and have been appointed to leadership in five national multidistrict litigations. We are not unfamiliar with how a case ends in front of a jury. Defense offers that do not reflect trial value are declined.
Federal courts have appointed our attorneys to Plaintiff’s Executive and Steering Committees in the Cook, Bard, and Cordis IVC filter MDLs, the Bard Hernia Mesh MDL, and to the Fee Committee in the Texas Opioid MDL. We have served as special outside counsel to the State of New Mexico and the State of Utah. We work at the level the case requires.
Representative matters obtained by attorneys now at Olson Injury Attorneys. Full result detail and prior-firm context are published on the Attorney Verdicts and Settlements page.
Tarrant County, Texas
Result obtained by Matthew R. McCarley while practicing with Fears Nachawati, PLLC (now Fears Law, PLLC).
State of Utah and approximately 100 public entities.
Result obtained by Matthew R. McCarley while practicing with Fears Nachawati / Fears Law, PLLC.
Breach of Warranty.
Multiple matters.
Past results afford no guarantee of future results. Every case is different and must be judged on its own merits. The outcome of any matter depends on the unique facts and circumstances of that case. Results may have been obtained when the attorney was practicing with a prior firm. Selections to Super Lawyers, Lawdragon 500 Leading Consumer Lawyers, and similar listings are made by the publishing organizations based on their own methodologies. No aspect of these advertisements has been approved by the Supreme Court of Texas.
Rideshare, nursing home, clergy and institutional abuse, and catastrophic injury or wrongful death matters worked as litigation files from the beginning.
Coverage stack, corporate negligence, full-merits litigation.
Learn moreStaffing, policies, regulatory standards. Tried on the facts.
Learn moreSurvivor representation against institutions. Discovery, depositions, trial.
Learn moreDocument-heavy, evidence-intensive, frequently tried.
Learn moreThis section is for counsel-facing correspondence. The firm does not accept new representation requests through this website.
Defense counsel, opposing counsel, and referring attorneys may use the main line below or the mailing and office details on the Contact page. Communications from prospective claimants through this website will not be reviewed and do not create an attorney-client relationship.
For service of pleadings, scheduling, mediation coordination, and case-specific correspondence, please contact the partner of record on the matter directly. The firm’s standard practice is to assign a partner-level contact at the time of engagement. General inquiries may be directed to the main office line above.
Referrals are evaluated on the merits and subject to written engagement and conflict check. We are selective about the matters we accept and prefer to discuss a potential referral by telephone before any client-side communication is initiated.
Service of process should be coordinated with the partner of record and effected at the approved physical office address for the matter during business hours. Mail should be sent only to the Mailing Address listed on the Contact page. The firm accepts service in matters in which it has appeared. Pleadings may also be served by email on the attorney of record where authorized by court order, rule, or written agreement of counsel.
The firm comments on its own matters only with client consent and does not provide commentary on pending litigation in which it is not counsel.
Do not send confidential or time-sensitive information until an attorney-client relationship has been established in writing.
